
US SEC sues Sentinel Management Group over client assets
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
The firm is accused of fraudulently moving $460 million of client securities from segregated customer accounts to its proprietary house account over a period of seven months. The SEC says Sentinel also pledged customer securities as collateral to obtain a $500 million line of credit facility for its own use.
It maintains that Sentinel commingled client assets without the ability to verify ownership of particular securities by particular clients; and provided false client account statements that did not accurately reflect client portfolio holdings or the fact that securities had been encumbered by the firm.
The SEC said Sentinel's customers suffered undisclosed losses for months before the firm sent them a letter on August 13, claiming it could not return their money without selling their assets at a discounts and incurring losses. The letter also falsely blamed the firm's predicament on the current liquidity crisis. Sentinel filed for bankruptcy four days later.
The US District Court in Chicago entered an order requiring the firm to provide a full accounting of client assets and its own assets and liabilities within five days. Sentinel was also ordered to produce certain brokerage and bank documents immediately, to begin the process of determining client portfolio holdings and ownership of securities. The SEC complaint also seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement and civil penalties against Sentinel.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether