Difficult January for Deutsche Bank
FRANKFURT – Deutsche Bank suffered a month of embarrassing headlines in January.
In the middle of the month, the bank's dismissal of derivatives trader Anshul Rustagi was the lead story in the European edition of the Financial Times newspaper. Rustagi was accused by the firm of allegedly overstating his trading position by almost £30 million, and dismissed for gross misconduct after a disciplinary hearing. Rustagi traded synthetic collateralised debt obligations and other complex forms of credit derivatives.
And at the end of the month, the bank was forced to quit its role as joint corporate broker for BOC Group, because of concerns about a conflict of interest over its role as adviser to Linde, the German conglomerate. According to press accounts, the German bank's pair of roles set tongues wagging in the City when Linde made a £7.6 billion bid for the UK-based gas company BOC days earlier. Compounding the situation is the fact that Deutsche owns 10% of Linde and the bank's chief executive sits on Linde's board.
Also at the end of the month a German court ruled that the chairman of the bank's supervisory board, Rolf Breuer, was wrong to question the creditworthiness of Leo Kirch's PrintBeteiligungs unit in 2002 in an interview with Bloomberg television. The comments precipitated the collapse of the firm, which was Germany's biggest bankruptcy since World War II.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules