JP Morgan Securities Asia receives 15-day suspension of stock index futures
TOKYO – JP Morgan Securities Asia was upbraided by the Japanese Financial Services Authority in early March for "acts of conducting a series of stock index futures transactions intended to create an artificial market which does not reflect actual state of the market".
According to a statement from the FSA, the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) conducted an inspection of JP Morgan Securities Asia's Tokyo branch, and found evidence that in November 2004, "conducting the Topix futures transactions on its overseas affiliated company's account, a trader of the branch placed in the TSE market a series of selling orders and purchasing orders at the same index point both by himself and matched them to each other. As a result, the branch conducted cross trades in the Topix futures transactions with no intention to transfer the rights represented by the Topix futures".
The FSA also accused the firm of "acts of making representation of a false statement or a misleading statement on any material matter, in connection with the sale or purchase of, or any other form of transaction in a security" in relation to an real estate securitisation product.
As a result, the regulator suspended stock index futures trades on the firm's own account for 15 days, and business in the real estate finance division for five days. It also demanded improvements in the firms' systems and controls.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” collusion in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy