JP Morgan Securities Asia receives 15-day suspension of stock index futures
TOKYO – JP Morgan Securities Asia was upbraided by the Japanese Financial Services Authority in early March for "acts of conducting a series of stock index futures transactions intended to create an artificial market which does not reflect actual state of the market".
According to a statement from the FSA, the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) conducted an inspection of JP Morgan Securities Asia's Tokyo branch, and found evidence that in November 2004, "conducting the Topix futures transactions on its overseas affiliated company's account, a trader of the branch placed in the TSE market a series of selling orders and purchasing orders at the same index point both by himself and matched them to each other. As a result, the branch conducted cross trades in the Topix futures transactions with no intention to transfer the rights represented by the Topix futures".
The FSA also accused the firm of "acts of making representation of a false statement or a misleading statement on any material matter, in connection with the sale or purchase of, or any other form of transaction in a security" in relation to an real estate securitisation product.
As a result, the regulator suspended stock index futures trades on the firm's own account for 15 days, and business in the real estate finance division for five days. It also demanded improvements in the firms' systems and controls.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint