HKMA issues open letter for compliance with SFO
HKMA warns about the penalties for unregistered dealing
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has sent an open letter to warn registered institutions of the importance of having adequate controls to ensure compliance with the prohibition of unregistered dealing under section 114(3) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO).
Registered institutions were also reminded to notify the HKMA promptly of changes to information related to relevant individuals pursuant to section 20(4) of the Banking Ordinance (BO).
Since the commencement of the SFO in April 2003, the HKMA has come across several cases of suspected unregistered dealings involving staff members of registered institutions, which has prompted this warning.
It suggests that registered institutions should put in place adequate control procedures to avoid possible unregistered dealings, including, among others, restricting certain staff members in receiving orders relating to securities or futures contracts from clients or execution of such orders; taking messages of telephone calls when the responsible relevant individuals are on leave or out of the office; to immediately report suspicion of any staff member to the compliance unit and where there is a reasonable grounds to believe unregistered dealing has taken place, the institution should immediately stop such practice and report the matter to the HKMA in writing as soon as practicable.
Registered institutions are also advised to ensure staff members who are seeking registration with the HKMA are fully aware that they are not allowed to engage in any regulated function of a regulated activity before proper registration; and to arrange regular training to staff on the implications of unregistered dealing and the importance of compliance with the relevant legal requirements.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews
Europe’s next chore: cleaning a floor made messy by the US
Rejection of Basel III’s output floor leaves EU with some difficult decisions to make
G-Sibs face daily data headache from US surcharge proposal
Move to more frequent measurement would be “massively burdensome”, says senior exec
Regulators question human-in-the-loop as AI governance tool
Bank of England and FSB executives suggest it’s more important to retain overall accountability
Esma supervisory switch could become ‘distraction’
Push to transform watchdog might hinder market reforms, say some