HKMA issues open letter for compliance with SFO
HKMA warns about the penalties for unregistered dealing
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has sent an open letter to warn registered institutions of the importance of having adequate controls to ensure compliance with the prohibition of unregistered dealing under section 114(3) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO).
Registered institutions were also reminded to notify the HKMA promptly of changes to information related to relevant individuals pursuant to section 20(4) of the Banking Ordinance (BO).
Since the commencement of the SFO in April 2003, the HKMA has come across several cases of suspected unregistered dealings involving staff members of registered institutions, which has prompted this warning.
It suggests that registered institutions should put in place adequate control procedures to avoid possible unregistered dealings, including, among others, restricting certain staff members in receiving orders relating to securities or futures contracts from clients or execution of such orders; taking messages of telephone calls when the responsible relevant individuals are on leave or out of the office; to immediately report suspicion of any staff member to the compliance unit and where there is a reasonable grounds to believe unregistered dealing has taken place, the institution should immediately stop such practice and report the matter to the HKMA in writing as soon as practicable.
Registered institutions are also advised to ensure staff members who are seeking registration with the HKMA are fully aware that they are not allowed to engage in any regulated function of a regulated activity before proper registration; and to arrange regular training to staff on the implications of unregistered dealing and the importance of compliance with the relevant legal requirements.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs