Pursuing alpha
Despite remaining unchanged since classical times, it seems the first two letters of the Greek alphabet are being reversed these days. At least that's what some leading international dealers are saying.
They reckon that certain popular structures such as constant maturity swap steepeners and range accruals, which were previously sold as yield-enhancing structures, are now so common that they represent market convention. That means they are no longer the alpha-generators of choice.
Today, they represent the market benchmark, effectively beta, dealers say. That's a strange concept given that each structure is different in terms of maturity, benchmark curve, leverage and so on.
Nevertheless, large dealers believe the new source of alpha comes from proprietary trading models, which are rules-based, established as indexes and sold to clients as structured products. By offering this new breed of so-called alpha-generating fixed-income products, dealers have apparently put themselves on a collision course with their hedge funds clients from which they make significant sums of money as trading counterparts, and to a lesser extent by acting as their prime brokers.
The argument goes that if a major bank can roll out proprietary trading models to its clients in a transparent manner, why would a customer pay the typical 2% asset-linked, 20% performance fees required by a black box hedge fund that, after all, could well be deploying exactly the same trading strategy? Sure, top hedge fund managers will probably outperform an algorithmic trading strategy, but there are hundreds of hedge funds that won't.
There is a loose analogy here with the early development of constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs), which automatically had to roll their positions despite the market conditions not necessarily being optimal to do so. Now, the same dealers that are touting managed CPDOs as a solution to that problem - they say a skilled manager can optimise the market timing of the roll - are nonetheless offering systematic index trades that may or may not suffer as they revolve into the next period of the contract.
- Christopher Jeffery.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Podcast: Olivier Daviaud on P&L attribution for options
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one