XVA traders have no time to rest on laurels
Markets have calmed, but they may not be out of the woods yet
Managing derivatives valuation adjustments (XVAs) is a complicated task at the best of times. This year, it has been especially tough.
Dealers that entered into uncollateralised foreign exchange and interest rate swaps with corporates saw those trades move deeply in-the-money when central banks cut interest rates in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, the credit quality of those clients deteriorated significantly. The combination of rising counterparty risk and soaring uncollateralised exposures caused credit valuation adjustment (CVA) charges to explode.
Across the eight systemically important US banks, the amount of risk-weighted assets (RWAs) attributed to CVA grew by nearly 50% – or $78 billion – between the fourth quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020.
This counterparty credit risk proved difficult to hedge. The spike in volatility meant credit default swap (CDS) options were “an absolute no-go” in March, according to one XVA trader, while liquidity in single-names was patchy at best.
To make matters worse, the uncollateralised rates and FX trades with corporates were often hedged with collateralised positions at clearing houses. That meant margin calls needed to be funded. The cost of doing so – reflected as funding valuation adjustment (FVA) in the profit and loss statement – jumped as US dollar liquidity was squeezed.
It all added up to billions of dollars in revenue deductions for dealers.
European banks that sought to hedge the interest rate and FX exposures that were pushing accounting CVA and FVA higher faced another headache. Bank capital rules treated these hedges as directional positions, creating an unwanted rise in market RWAs.
Calm, for now
It may be fortunate for XVA traders’ blood pressure that things have calmed down since then. CDS spreads have tightened. And dealer funding costs, measured by asset swap spreads on bank bonds, have also come back down. Spreads on some JP Morgan and Bank of America bonds turned negative recently, indicating demand to buy and cheaper funding costs for those banks, after selling pressure pushed spreads to more than 500 basis points on March 20.
But XVA desks cannot afford to rest on their laurels. Many are using the downtime to dissect the events of March and April to see what worked and what did not. CVA strategies are being refined to avoid falling into a spiral of worsening credit spreads and disappearing liquidity. European regulators have thus far refused to carve out these hedges from market risk capital requirements and some dealers are overhauling their models to deal with the problem.
This could turn out to be time well spent. While credit spreads have tightened, XVA traders are not convinced the market is out of the woods just yet. The credit foundations of the market have been badly shaken, says one XVA trader. And while volatility has subsided, he expects to see more defaults over the next six to nine months.
“Neither of those topics are going away, so in some ways we’re still in the middle of the crisis even though it doesn’t feel like it. We still need to have our eyes peeled,” he says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
SpaceX gives CME’s single-stock futures a much-needed boost
New contracts could take off as IPO bolt-on to S&P 500 contracts
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
Have regulators gone soft on enforcement? (And should we care?)
US agencies are scaling back punishments for technical rule breaches, raising concerns that small but crucial risks may be ignored
Beyond FX HedgePool: what’s next for all-to-all?
Proponents see bright future for trading model, but obstacles to take-up remain
Basel’s CVA upgrade: persuasive in the US, less so in Europe
Ban on credit risk models could encourage US banks to adopt more sophisticated CVA method
Is alt data betting on prediction markets?
While offering a rich source of new data, legal uncertainties remain
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Private credit disclosures leave more questions than answers
Muddled metrics and scattergun reporting hinder comparison of US lenders