![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Clearing up Deutsche’s swaps ‘shift’
Reported move of euro business is not as straightforward – or as dramatic – as it seemed
![deutsche-bank-1 deutsche-bank-1](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/108/167108/deutsche-bank--580x358.jpg.webp?itok=jAPyMwT4)
In the battle for euro swaps clearing, Frankfurt scored some points this week, as Deutsche Bank moved half of its business to Eurex.
The news was broken by the Financial Times, and seized on by dozens of other outlets – plus UK celebrity businessman, Alan Sugar – as a sign Brexit is starting to have an impact on London’s strength as a financial centre.
The problem is that cleared swaps don’t move – they have to be offset, compressed to zero, and then executed anew at a different venue. And Deutsche Bank says that’s not what happened. There’s also been no physical transfer of people or operations as some reports suggested.
So, what did happen?
The official line is that “a large part” of new cleared swaps business will be cleared in Frankfurt, according to a spokesperson at the bank. But, to a large extent, this isn’t Deutsche Bank’s choice. The clearing venue for an interest rate swap is determined by the client, not the dealer, and it would be no surprise if the customers of the German bank’s clearing franchise were choosing a German clearing house.
There may still be a Brexit angle here, however. If more of Deutsche’s clearing clients are starting to send their trades to Eurex, then it may be a reflection of their desire to avoid a disorderly Brexit. And as more of the client business travels to Frankfurt, Deutsche Bank is able to send a larger portion of its house business – interdealer trades that hedge client activities – in the same direction.
According to a source familiar with the situation, Deutsche Bank is currently sending as much as 40–45% of new euro swaps business to Frankfurt.
The bank presents its motives in all of this as straightforwardly commercial, stemming from a profit-sharing agreement introduced by Eurex in late 2017 – the German venue’s attempt to prise business from LCH on a voluntary basis.
Of the 30 scheme members – soon to be 35 as the first hedge funds seek membership – the top 10 firms (ranked by volume with additional credits awarded for other metrics such as pricing quality and introducing new clients) enjoy a share of the profits. The bigger their share of activity, the bigger the spoils.
Deutsche Bank is already topping that table, closely followed by JP Morgan and BNP Paribas.
A big caveat applies here as well. The bulk of trades currently being directed to Frankfurt are short dated and low risk. Of the €8 trillion ($9.3 trillion) notional in cleared euro swaps sitting with Eurex, €5.7 trillion are forward rate agreements (FRAs) – interdealer products where the clearing venue is not dictated by client needs. That represents around 12% of total cleared euro FRA notional but Eurex reckons its share of new trades has been almost half the market’s volume in some months.
Boiling it all down, there are some signs that Brexit tailwinds are benefitting the German exchange – but this is a story that has some way to run. Based on this week’s coverage, you might assume it was already over.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Podcast: Lorenzo Ravagli on why the skew is for the many
JP Morgan quant proposes a unified framework for trading the volatility skew premium
Quants see promise in DeBerta’s untangled reading
Improved language models are able to grasp context better
Counterparty risk model links defaults to portfolio values
Fed’s Michael Pykhtin proposes using copula models to capture effects of margin calls on default risk
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
Is JSCC-CFTC stalemate about to be broken?
Japan CCP gains allies in battle to clear yen swaps for US clients, but CFTC shakeup could dash hopes
What T+1 risk? Dealers shake off FX concerns
Predictions of increased settlement risk and later-in-the-day trading have yet to materialise
Go your own way: departures pose new challenges for CFTC
Loss of Democratic majority would impede chairman’s ambitions for regulatory agenda
Altice’s dropdown is a warning for European creditors
Carve-out used to shield assets from lenders may occur in a fifth of European deals