So, what are we going to do now?
Along with the rain clouds, that was the question hanging over the annual get-together of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in Lisbon last week. (Scroll down for Risk.net’s full coverage of the event).
Isda made its name in the pre-crisis years by producing the legal templates on which the over-the-counter market’s staggering growth was founded. In the years following the crisis, having lost its long battle to prevent the market from being regulated directly, it has lobbied to constrain and change the rules, or built tools to help the industry comply.
Now, as the market wades through the last of the post-crisis reforms, Isda needs a new job. How is it going to redefine itself?
The question was answered most directly in the sessions that bookended the two-day event. In Scott O’Malia’s opening address, the association’s chief executive highlighted the operational mess created by the multiple compliance sprints the industry has undertaken in recent years.
“The focus has been on meeting deadlines, rather than creating consistency or efficiency. Now is the time for the industry to take a thorough look at the system and determine what works, what doesn’t, and how we can unlock value through efficiency. We need to be bold,” he said.
It wasn’t until the end of the event that it became clear how bold Isda plans to be. In the final session of the last day, as exhibitors packed up their stands outside, a panel of operations, tech and market structure experts from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Societe Generale took the baton and ran with it.
Common domain model
Operationally, the market is a mess, they all agreed, which limits the ability of existing participants – and the eager ranks of fintech and regtech vendors – to innovate. This mess needs to be tidied up, and the broom will be something called a ‘common domain model’.
Ayaz Haji, head of Mifid II technical architecture and data strategy at Goldman Sachs, explained the term: “For our industry, we have a set of actions, life-cycle events, products, that we, as an industry, care about and we, as an industry, exchange data about. Really, the common domain model is a single definition of those things, according to the market structures that we have.”
From inception of a trade via an order or an equiry, through to the compression, settlement or expiry of that trade, a common domain model would specify precisely what is required at each step. In other words, from its roots in standardising the legal basis for the OTC market, Isda now plans to try and standardise the data and processes required to make the market operate.
From its roots in standardising the legal basis for the OTC market, Isda now plans to try and standardise the data and processes required to make the market operate
Haji described this as “a technical enabler to get us to the technical nirvana that’s been sold to us on all these other panels. When we talk about the fintech and regtech solutions the market needs, we see this as a foundational layer that needs to be there before we start on this journey.”
As the panellists conceded, this is a simple idea that will be very complex to deliver. It will be complex, in part, because the banks that made up the Isda panel are not the only ones with an idea on how the market should work. Post-crisis regulation has separated the OTC business operationally into a series of distinct layers required to execute, report, clear and margin a trade. There are already multiple firms that occupy each of these layers.
What part will these firms be allowed to play in the common domain model? The Isda panellists sought to be disarming on this point – they would not be dictating answers to the rest of the market, they said, and invited other firms to get involved.
But as the current legal wrangle between Markit and trueEX demonstrates, the tangled complexity of OTC market structure conceals elemental questions of life and death. The common domain model, however dull it sounds, could become a lightning rod for this kind of controversy.
See below for Risk.net’s full coverage of Isda’s 2017 annual general meeting.
Isda AGM 2017 roundup
Location policy would result in higher margin costs, lower liquidity, says Maguire
Panellists warn repo market is risky way to fund swaps margin
New BNP Paribas system already creating counterparty trading probabilities for bonds
EBA acknowledges approach’s shortcomings, but warns Basel is not reconsidering
Start legal negotiations now or risk missing September deadline, warn dealers
Banks picked up big bill but few benefits, says UBS ALM exec
Netting of clearing collateral would boost activity without weakening banks, claims CFTC chair
Transition period may allow time for Basel to recalibrate rules, panellists note
New guidelines aim to prevent EU brass plates with large London operations
Regulator and industry emphasise need for effective clearing house supervision
Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
CFTC’s Giancarlo says geography has been no barrier for EU CCPs in the US
New analysis – due next month – looks at clearing network risks
The week on Risk.net, October 6-12, 2017Receive this by email
- SGX, HKEX expect to be among first wave of Mifid II equivalence
- Leaked EU doc could shield legacy swaps from clearing grab
- Quantile, TriOptima face off in cleared swaps compression battle
- ABS set for revival under US Treasury’s liquidity buffer plans
- Quants stymied by lack of alternative risk premia flows data