
Feet of Clayton
New SEC chairman split between presidential deregulation agenda and filling holes in existing rules
Jay Clayton faces a predicament. The Sullivan & Cromwell partner has been nominated to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by a White House hostile to the complex regulatory framework that took shape under the Obama administration, but he would be taking the reins at an agency that has a huge amount of regulation on its to-do list.
As of April 2017, derivatives markets are still awaiting Dodd-Frank Act mandates establishing capital, margin and segregation rules for security-based swaps, as well as regulations governing execution of the products on regulated trading venues and the mandatory clearing of the instruments at central counterparties.
In the absence of these rules, a non-bank actor making markets in credit default swaps is today able to engage in the same uncollateralised, non-cleared and non-capitalised credit derivatives trading that brought American International Group to the brink of collapse in 2008.
It didn’t have to be like this. As this month’s cover story reveals, SEC staff wrote a proposal calling for the mandatory clearing of approximately 100 single-name credit default swap contracts back in 2013. That proposed rule was passed up to the SEC commissioners, but was never put to a vote, and withered on the vine.
A new effort to finalise the entire suite of security-based swap rules got underway in 2014, only to see the clock run out in November 2016. The shock election of President Donald Trump derailed the sequenced rollout of the final regulations, and SEC chair Mary Jo White instructed the agency’s staff to pause all rulemaking activity until the new administration had appointed her successor.
This brings us back to the balancing act now facing Clayton. The White House expects him to lead its deregulatory agenda by simplifying SEC rules to relieve the compliance burden on US securities markets.
At the same time, however, one of the first issues facing Clayton upon assuming the chairmanship is what to do with the outstanding Dodd-Frank rules that remain to be finalised. The agency’s division of trading and markets has a suite of security-based swap rulemakings ready to put to an immediate vote. Will Clayton give the go-ahead to finalise the rules? Or will he instruct the staff to drop the matter and recalibrate their efforts for a new era of deregulation?
Clayton himself seems unsure. At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Committee on Banking and Urban Affairs on March 24, he stated he has “a problem with regulations that are unnecessarily complex”, but then hedged that position by reassuring Democratic senators that “rulemaking should go forward with respect to rules required under a statute”.
How Clayton will proceed in the months ahead is anyone’s guess. But one thing is certain: watching him attempt this delicate tightrope walk will make for fascinating viewing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Getting a handle on model parameters
Mean reversion in rate parameters opens the door to dimensionality reduction
The case for believing in a Bessent put
Money market funds could prove critical in efforts to control 10-year yields
FRTB may bite harder for Europe’s CVA modellers
Farther reach of advanced approach and lighter load on total requirements mean limited takeaways from Canada and Japan’s implementation
Japan, Basel III and the pitfalls of being on time
Capital floor phase-in delay may be least-worst option for JFSA as US and Europe waver
FX traders revel in March Madness
Chaotic Trump policies finally bring diversity to flows – to the delight of market-makers
Market knee-jerks keep VAR models on their toes
With a return to volatility, increased backtesting exceptions show banks’ algos are stretched
A market-making model for an options portfolio
Vladimir Lucic and Alex Tse fill a glaring gap in European-style derivatives modelling
How AI agents could become investing’s crash test dummies
Firms mull the use of chatbot simulations to test organisational set-ups