Skip to main content

Banks can’t get a straight answer on BCBS 239 compliance

Regulators sidestep questions on whether ‘material compliance’ amounts to full compliance

audit skeptic
“We have not gotten a clear answer up to now,” says a BCBS 239 project head

Banks are awaiting guidance from regulators on whether they can be considered in full compliance with risk data-aggregation and reporting principles if their largest units are.

Regulators have been impatient at the pace of progress banks have made on those principles, known as BCBS 239, and have hinted darkly that capital add-ons could be on the cards. Banks with weak risk data can also fail the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

ALM Benchmarking: explore the data

View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation

Most read articles loading...