E.on’s move for Ruhrgas hits problems
The court in the western city of Dusseldorf upheld an August injunction blocking the E10 billion ($10.3 billion) takeover move, thus overturning the federal government’s decision to approve the deal in July. Several rival energy companies, including US-based TXU and Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg (EBW), filed motions with the court arguing that the takeover would stifle competition in the German market.
E.on, which already controls about 40% of Ruhrgas, said in a statement that it regretted the decision and did not consider court’s argument to be convincing. A final ruling on the acquisition is due in February 2003.
E.on has waged an aggressive campaign of expansion over the past two years. It completed its purchase of UK utility Powergen in July 2002 and acquired the retail business of troubled energy firm TXU Europe in October. That deal is still awaiting approval from the European Commission.
A successful bid for Ruhrgas would make E.on the biggest energy firm in Europe after Electricité de France.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
AI governance rules coming soon, says CFTC chair
Selig doesn’t want to stifle innovation, but says trading or advice algos will need guardrails
For Esma the supervisor, people power will be prime
Industry hopes to avoid people risk during transition, with help from national authorities
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules