The subprime bank heist
It might seem extreme to consider anyone wanting to buy a house as a potential criminal, but this may not be as far away from the truth as one might imagine. Intentionally or not, borrowers have been quick to jump into the getaway car being driven by unscrupulous mortgage brokers offering incredible deals. While lenders can be blamed for making it too easy to rob the bank, this doesn't change the fact that fraud is fraud. And as the postmortem on the subprime debacle unfolds, the topic of fraud has climbed to the top of the list.
The US Federal Bureau of Investigation created a mortgage fraud task force in March, after statistics from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network showed that suspicious activity reports related to mortgage fraud rose to an astonishing 46,700 in 2007 from just 3,515 cases in 2000, representing approximately $1 billion in losses (see "Deception and lies", page 22).
Also in March, New York attorney-general Andrew Cuomo struck a deal with government-sponsored mortgage agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prevent the future mis-selling of mortgages and to tighten up lending practices. Under the deal, euphemistically termed the "New Home Valuation Protection Code", the agencies agreed to buy new mortgages only from banks that adhere to rules designed to combat mortgage fraud and predatory lending.
Lenders are also looking at ways to get a grip on the problem, in particular, the role of mortgage brokers. When the US housing market was on the rise, lenders largely turned a blind eye to the kinds of dubious deals that brokers had been striking with borrowers.
No longer. Since noticing that certain brokers were purposely selecting lenders for bad loans, they began looking for an impartial third party to collect data on the loan level, specifically related to the geography and the broker. Brokers are not liable for loans taken out and they typically earn higher commissions for more complex loan structures, so there have been suggestions in the market that brokers pushed borrowers to the limit and byond. In some cases, brokers were even said to have helped borrowers commit fraud or were themselves part of a ring of fraudsters (see Cover story, page 16).
First American CoreLogic in Sacramento, California, has stepped into the breach with its Broker Scorecard, which allows an originator to type in a code to review how an individual broker is ranked in terms of their business and the industry as a whole. And in a sign of just how bad things have become, Walter Allen, senior vice president of capital markets at the firm, reports that originators have observed suspect brokers moving to other banks for business as the new due diligence solutions take hold, (see "Core value", page 20).
This leads one to wonder whether the US subprime debacle wasn't a financial markets catastrophe at all but the biggest bank heist ever - not just in terms of money, but also for the sheer number of thieves involved.- William Rhode, acting managing editor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product