De Larosiere calls for ECB to lead European macro supervision
The European Central Bank would lead a new body intended to provide early warning of future financial crises, under proposals presented to the European Commission today.
The ECB would chair a group of European central banks in charge of macro-prudential supervision - monitoring the European financial industry for signs of another financial crisis. Meanwhile, at the micro level, three new bodies would formalise existing cooperation between national regulators: the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance Authority and the European Securities Authority.
The proposals, published today by the European Union's High Level Group on Financial Supervision, blamed national regulators for paying insufficient attention to system-wide issues such as liquidity and transparency in the run-up to the crisis. The group, chaired by Jacques de Larosiere, a former managing director of the International Monetary Fund and former governor of the Bank of France, also called for reform to the Basel II capital adequacy rules, which they condemned as procyclical, and for tighter regulation of credit rating agencies.
Additionally, the group backed calls for central clearing of credit default swaps (CDS): "at least one" clearing house should be set up in the European Union, it said, though not necessarily in the eurozone; however, the ECB should be involved in supervision, as 80% of CDS trades were euro-denominated, the group added.
See also: Liffe blames regulatory uncertainty for lack of CDS clearing
Banks agree to EU CCP for clearing CDS
European CDS regulation 'inevitable' - EC official
EC pushing for rating agency regulation
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European Commission plans permanent changes to FRTB
EU legislator will start work on new rules later this year to ensure level playing field with US
Why bank stablecoin projects get stuck in the sandbox
Five years ago, a wave of banks launched stablecoin projects, but most never got beyond the testing phase
Banks fear US cross-product capital relief will fall short
Proposal to treat repo as futures for SA-CCR may not do enough to support UST clearing mandate
AI governance rules coming soon, says CFTC chair
Selig doesn’t want to stifle innovation, but says trading or advice algos will need guardrails
For Esma the supervisor, people power will be prime
Industry hopes to avoid people risk during transition, with help from national authorities
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs