De Larosiere calls for ECB to lead European macro supervision
The European Central Bank would lead a new body intended to provide early warning of future financial crises, under proposals presented to the European Commission today.
The ECB would chair a group of European central banks in charge of macro-prudential supervision - monitoring the European financial industry for signs of another financial crisis. Meanwhile, at the micro level, three new bodies would formalise existing cooperation between national regulators: the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance Authority and the European Securities Authority.
The proposals, published today by the European Union's High Level Group on Financial Supervision, blamed national regulators for paying insufficient attention to system-wide issues such as liquidity and transparency in the run-up to the crisis. The group, chaired by Jacques de Larosiere, a former managing director of the International Monetary Fund and former governor of the Bank of France, also called for reform to the Basel II capital adequacy rules, which they condemned as procyclical, and for tighter regulation of credit rating agencies.
Additionally, the group backed calls for central clearing of credit default swaps (CDS): "at least one" clearing house should be set up in the European Union, it said, though not necessarily in the eurozone; however, the ECB should be involved in supervision, as 80% of CDS trades were euro-denominated, the group added.
See also: Liffe blames regulatory uncertainty for lack of CDS clearing
Banks agree to EU CCP for clearing CDS
European CDS regulation 'inevitable' - EC official
EC pushing for rating agency regulation
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB revamp won’t restore models to past glory, risk managers say
US-inspired reform only expected to lead to small boost in adoption, with limited desks on IMA
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Time to let some air out of the banking system?
Watchdogs worry about lowering standards, but policy-makers eye growth – they face a difficult dilemma
Competitiveness mandate for Esma faces uphill battle
European Parliament offers last chance to force Esma to take more nuanced approach
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
Can US perpetual futures solve their identity crisis?
Market could fall under four different regulatory categories, with sharply diverging outcomes
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision