Indian NPA securitisations to grow, says Fitch
India’s non-performing asset (NPA) securitisation market is set to grow from present levels, according to a report by Fitch Ratings. This will help the sub-continent’s banks to resolve over IRp600 billion ($13.5 billion) of NPAs sitting on their balance sheets.
"The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has encouraged investment in the sector by permitting foreign direct investors to buy equities of asset reconstruction companies (Arcs) and allowing foreign institutional investors to invest in security receipts," said Sunil Subramanian, associate director in Fitch's structured finance group in Mumbai. "Furthermore, by bringing out guidelines for the buyout of NPAs by non-Arcs, the RBI has also attempted to regulate their business."
However, Fitch believes urgent reforms are still required in areas such as: the rationalisation of stamp duties; the setting up of more Arcs – the only functional Arc in India is called the Asset Reconstruction Company; the implementation of the National Company Law Tribunal, which Fitch says is necessary for the Securitisation Act to fulfil its potential; and the creation of a more robust legal system for the disposal of recovery cases.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules