Risk managers' salaries and bonuses soared in 2005, says study
Risk management professionals received high bonuses on top of sharply higher salaries in 2005, according to a recent survey by Risk Talent Associates, a US-based risk recruiting company.
The survey also found that chief risk officers’ total compensation increased from just over $800,000 to $1 million between 2003 and 2005, of which about 70% was made up of bonuses.
Michael Woodrow, president of Risk Talent Associates, said: “It is no surprise that bonuses are up substantially in 2005. We all heard the news that capital markets firms had considerable earnings last year. As expected, they compensated their risk people accordingly, as sound risk management systems and practices allowed firms to take smarter risks that paid off.”
Woodrow also noted that 17% of survey respondents reported changing their jobs in 2005, although most chose to stay within investment and commercial banking. He added that demand for exceptional risk managers has become very tight, spurring a sharp rise in compensation packages in the industry. “There is a developing trend that top risk managers, at all levels, who have seen increases in stature and compensation, are less likely to change firms," he said. "Last year, we saw several examples where firms refused to allow their top risk managers to go to their competitors. Hiring firms should understand that a candidate’s current employer will likely try to match an offer.”
Figures specifically for Asia-Pacific were not available, but Woodrow notes the region is also experiencing a shortage of risk management professionals. “As the US and UK markets grew, they borrowed talent from other areas – finance, product control among others - and these individuals grew their skill sets as the risk management market matured," he says. "The challenge in Asia is that risk management principles and practices have matured, but the market doesn’t have the local talent pool to deal with the sophistication. We are witnessing firms relocate individuals from the UK and US, who will in turn build and train local teams.”
Despite the huge growth, Woodrow believes the bonuses are not overly inflated. “The hedge fund markets continue to grow, these firms and their investment banking trading partners continue to take on more risk. They need to manage this risk to be profitable and to stay in business," Woodrow said. "I don’t believe that bonuses and compensation in Asia are inflated. They are market driven – these firms are experts in paying the compensation they need to keep the people they want.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos