Equitable Life drops E&Y case
After a costly five-month trial in London's High Court, Equitable Life, the UK mutual life insurer has dropped its £750 million claim against its former auditor Ernst & Young. Equitable's management had accused E&Y of negligence because it approved accounts filed by previous managers, who have also been the subject of a lawsuit.
Like a number of UK insurers, Equitable had offered guaranteed annuity rates (GARs) to with-profits policyholders which became valuable when UK interest rates fell in the late 1990s. Unlike other companies, Equitable's management refused to reserve against the GAR liabilities even when the cost became known, but instead attempted to reduce the GAR policyholders' bonus rates, a policy that was overruled in 2000 by the House of Lords.
Fighting the case has put strains on E&Y's life consulting business due to the heavy demands on partners' time. In particular, the firm's annual solvency review of UK life companies, last published in July 2004, has been delayed for over three months. The review has already been criticised by some leading UK life companies for its use of outdated metrics in the context of realistic reporting and economic capital reserves.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Foreign exchange
Will Taiwan lifers ramp up FX hedging amid tariff turmoil?
As TWD remains strong against the US dollar, Taiwanese life insurers are still poised to act
Deutsche Bank takes AutobahnFX on the open road
Proprietary trading platform sets out new workflow-based approach to collaborating with venues
Dealers bullish on Bloomberg chat interface for FX markets
Service expanded its API offering to integrate broker chats into banks’ engines for cash FX pricing late last year
LCH expects to boost deliverable FX clearing with new adds
Onboarding of dealers and link-up with CLS could swell interbank deliverable FX clearing volumes
Does no-hedge strategy stack up for mag seven mavericks?
At Amazon, Meta and Tesla, the lack of FX hedging might raise eyebrows, but isn’t necessarily a losing technique
Amazon, Meta and Tesla reject FX hedging
Risk.net study shows tech giants don’t hedge day-to-day exposures
Intraday FX swaps could signal new dawn for liquidity management
Seedling market could help banks pre-fund payments in near-real time and reduce HQLA requirements
Natixis turns on the taps in flow trading
French bank boosts flow business, balancing structured solutions capabilities