Electronic derivatives brokerages merge
Talks between the two firms began in earnest just two months back, says Jack Parrish, Stockholm-based chief executive officer of iFox. “The merger makes sense because while we share a similar approach to the market, we have different client bases,” he adds. The merger will create a client base that spans all of western Europe – combining iFox’s strong presence in Scandinavia, Germany and London, and atenX’s strength in France, London and the Benelux countries.
Dealers agree. “It’s an excellent idea to merge these two platforms,” says Pablo Vergara, Netherlands-based treasury manager at Rabobank. “We use atenX and iFox, but perhaps each has been a little too limited individually. Merged, they will bring different participants with different outlooks together on a single platform,” he adds.
“It will link previously disparate pools of liquidity to create a single dominant platform for major players,” says a swaps market-maker at a European house who asked to remain anonymous. But other more localised platforms still have a place: “Platforms like e-Mider, for example, will continue to do good business with smaller second-tier banks,” he adds – referring to one of ATFox’s main competitor, Italy-based electronic brokerage e-Mider.
Backed by venture capital financing, Parrish co-founded iFox back in 2000. The firm’s initial focus was on interest rate swaps, but it soon realised that the real action was in the short end of the market. Over the past three years, there has been a greater than twofold increase in trading volumes of European Overnight Index Average swaps (Eonias). Overnight swaps have been around for a while, but the introduction of the euro has encouraged greater trading flows between European countries – making Eonias the preferred interest rate hedge in the money markets.
After a few months of sluggish activity following September 11, volumes have picked-up significantly, Parrish claims. “The average ticket size has grown too. Previously, transactions were typically in the E100 million–300 million range. Today, it’s not uncommon to book a E1 billion ticket,” he says.
Parrish says that combining the best features of each individual platform will encourage yet more business, but that simplicity is the key: “Some kind of bulletin board, or system that requires you to enter a large amount of complex data to get a trade done, is just not going to appeal to traders in the market,” he says.
All trades on the new platform go through a central order book, and though not an exchange, the front end will seem familiar to those that trade electronic exchanges, Parrish says. There will be flexibility in terms of the order types possible on ATFox. For example, both timed- and hidden-orders will be available to dealers.
But while the new electronic platform is fundamental to ATFox’s business plan, the new venture will take a hybrid approach. Standard vanilla derivatives will typically trade electronically, but for more exotic products voice brokerage will be available from HPC Group – one of Europe’s largest voice brokerages and formerly atenX’s parent company prior to a management buyout in 2000.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them
CME faces battle for clients after Treasuries clearing approval
Some members not ready to commit to 2026 start date; rival FICC enhances services
AI and the next era of Apac compliance
How Apac compliance leaders are preparing for the next era of AI-driven oversight
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance