IAFE releases op risk white paper for buy-side firms
The International Association of Financial Engineers (IAFE) yesterday released a white paper on operational risk for buy-side institutions, which concludes that business reputation rather than Basel-inspired regulation is the real driver for implementing robust operational risk management systems.
“Although it is generally agreed that operational risk does not lend itself to measurement in the same way as market or credit risk, there are models and methodologies used by banking and insurance communities that can be adopted by fund companies,” the IAFE said. “[The] establishment of a progressive operational risk culture by the use of communication and educational techniques... along with self-assessment questionnaires and operational risk models and scenario testing, comprise an important marketing cache for an operational risk manager,” the association added.
The impending Basel II capital requirements mean that several buy-side operations within major global banks are currently working on establishing operational risk cultures within their institutions, and pushing out “ownership” of risk to the business managers, the IAFE added. But the professional body claimed that these institutions are focusing beyond modelling and regulatory issues by establishing programmes that have strong business and client relationship justifications.
“Ultimately, managing operational risk within a buy-side organisation means upholding promises to clients. Breach of fiduciary trust is a major operational risk within this community, and what ultimately leads to lawsuits and ‘headline risk',” the paper continued. “One important method for managing fiduciary risk is to learn from the failings of other firms in order to avoid similar mishaps within one’s own firm.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Microsoft outage disrupts structured notes trading
Document-heavy OTC trades upended as term sheets and confirmations languished in outboxes
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche