Basel II securitisation paper planned for October
Global banking regulators plan to issue on October 1 a working paper on the treatment of asset securitisation in the Basel II banking Accord, one of the issues that prompted its delay until late 2006.
The Committee plans to issue its key third quantitative impact study (QIS3) seeking information on how banks would be affected by the complex, risk-based Accord, along with a non-technical paper explaining Basel II’s progress.
In March, the Basel Committee decided to delay Basel II’s introduction for the second time. This was mainly due to significant work still required in asset securitisation and lending to small to medium-sized enterprises.
Regulators now believe solutions to both issues will be achieved in the next few months, and that the Accord will succeed in meeting the revised timetable. QIS3, accompanied by detailed notes and explanations, should give bankers a very clear idea of the final shape of Basel II, regulators said. A third consultative paper (CP3) is targeted for May next year, with bankers given a 90-day period for comment.
Basel II in its final form should then be ready by November 2003, giving national governments three years to pass any necessary laws.
Meanwhile, the Basel Committee’s risk management group, which is meeting today and tomorrow in Luxembourg, is due to set a publication date for a survey seeking more information on operational losses from banks. The survey is expected within weeks.
The information is needed by regulators to help refine their ideas on advanced approaches to measuring operational risk.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions