2008 LDCE “under consideration”
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to discuss a new loss data collection exercise at its next meeting in January
A new operational risk loss data collection exercise (LCDE) will be considered at the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s next meeting in January, according to Marco Moscadelli, senior analyst in banking supervision at the Bank of Italy and a member of the BCBS’s Accord Implementation Group.
Moscadelli, who was speaking at the OpRisk Middle East conference today in Dubai, noted the last global LDCE was conducted in 2001 and reported on by the Basel Committee in 2002. The US, Germany and a handful of other countries also conducted an LDCE in 2004, which was reported on in 2005. The new LDCE is expected to be global in scope, and could kick off as early as the first quarter of 2008 once it is approved.
LDCEs collect and compare loss data from banks in countries implementing Basel II, and were used to calibrate calculations for the various op risk approaches under the new Basel Accord when it was in development.
Moscadelli says the committee will discuss the “deliverables” of the LDCE for the banks themselves, including the format of the data input templates, and how the data will be processed and reported back to the industry.
Moscadelli also indicated there was a possibility that scenario analysis results will also be included in the LDCE, as many banks have been relying more on scenarios than on loss data in their op risk models.
Lastly, he said the LDCE would enable regulators to compare the data of advanced measurement approach candidates globally.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them
CME faces battle for clients after Treasuries clearing approval
Some members not ready to commit to 2026 start date; rival FICC enhances services
AI and the next era of Apac compliance
How Apac compliance leaders are preparing for the next era of AI-driven oversight
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance