US rescue bill meets opposition in Congress
Markets wobble due to political wrangling concerning approval of the $700 billion rescue deal proposed by the Treasury last week
WASHINGTON, DC – Democrats have begun to voice their concerns over the $700 billion rescue deal thrashed out by the US Treasury last week in conjunction with the Federal Reserve and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Treasury secretary Henry Paulson submitted legislation to Congress requesting authority to purchase illiquid mortgage-related assets from financial institutions to promote market stability. Under the terms of the deal, the Treasury will have the authority to issue up to $700 billion of Treasury securities to finance the purchase of the assets. The treasury secretary will have the discretion, in consultation with the chairman of the Federal Reserve, to “purchase other assets, as deemed necessary to effectively stabilise financial markets”, but the authority to purchase expires two years from date of enactment.
Congressional Democrats are concerned the new deal gives too much power to the Treasury department and are calling for greater legislative oversight of the department, as well as more direct assistance for homeowners and limits on top bankers’ pay whose firms seek help.
Opponents of the plan have also raised concerns that the deal will be extended to include non-US financial institutions. The legislation states that, for banks to qualify for the programme, “assets must have been originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008,” and that “participating financial institutions must have significant operations in the US, unless the secretary makes a determination, in consultation with the chairman of the Federal Reserve, that broader eligibility is necessary to effectively stabilise financial markets.”
This ambiguity, and the Congressional opposition, caused shares to fall in London as traders doubted whether non-US institutions would be included in the deal.
Paulson continues to push for a resolution by this Friday. However, some lawmakers baulk at the idea of rushing into approving such extraordinary new powers for the Treasury secretary.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives
Repo clearing: expanding access, boosting resilience
Michel Semaan, head of RepoClear at LSEG, discusses evolving requirements in repo clearing
The state of IMA: great expectations meet reality
Latest trading book rules overhaul internal models approach, but most banks are opting out. Two risk experts explore why
How geopolitical risk turned into a systemic stress test
Conflict over resources is reshaping markets in a way that goes beyond occasional risk premia
Many banks see obstacles to options-based IRRBB hedging
Liquidity, accounting treatment and culture seen as impediments to wider use of swaptions, caps and floors
ALM has no formal role in capital planning at a third of banks
Risk Benchmarking study finds banks split three ways on policy mandates, with G-Sibs as likely as small regionals to assign ALM formal responsibility
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
SGX fortifies its defences to ward off tomorrow’s outages
Exchange operator fosters “breach mentality” to help prepare for business disruption, explains risk chief