FSA update on Money Laundering Regulations 2007
The UK’s FSA has published updated money laundering regulations
LONDON – The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has published information revealing new and increased supervisory responsibilities for tackling financial crime. The Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (MLR) brought before Parliament this summer will bring the UK into alignment with the European Union’s Third Money Laundering Directive (3MLD) before the implementation deadline of December 15, 2007.
The FSA will assume responsibility for Annex I financial institutions, which includes supervision of businesses’ carrying activities for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing purposes. These previously unregulated activities include lending, financial leasing, safe custody services, issuing and administering means of payment, offering guarantees and commitments, participation in securities issues and providing related services, and advice to undertakings on capital structure, industrial strategy and related questions and advice, as well as services relating to mergers and the purchase of undertakings.
A risk-based approach will be adopted in supervision, with supervisory resources concentrated where risk is greatest. Questionnaires, ad hoc information requests, mystery shopping, help lines and thematic works will be used in considering the anti-money laundering controls of registered businesses.
For enforcement, a risk-based evaluation of the nature and seriousness of any suspected breach of the MLR will be considered before the FSA responds. Information requirements, interviews and search warrants are some of wide range of investigative tools available for enforcement.
The FSA has published a document outlining its approach to registering and supervising the businesses that will, for the first time, be monitored under MLR. Businesses that are not yet registered and perform activities such as money broking, portfolio management and advice, and safekeeping and administration of securities as well as those activities listed above could be required to register with the FSA. However, a business will not need to register with the FSA if it only performs such an activity on an occasional or very limited basis. The paper considers what it means to be a registered business under the MLR, who needs to register and how to go about registering with the FSA. The FSA has the authority to levy penalties on (and in certain cases prosecute) registered businesses.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts