CBI/PwC survey “one of the gloomiest ever”
The 73rd CBI/PwC quarterly financial services survey showed an industry-wide fall in optimism across sectors
LONDON – Optimism is almost at an all-time low across all sectors of the financial services industry, according to a new quarterly survey released by financial advisory firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI).
As the credit squeeze continued, income values fell sharply while costs continued to rise. Most respondents agreed that the fallout from the credit crunch would continue for up to six months, while others believe it could continue for at least another six months. That said, employment and investment, particularly in IT, are rising, indicating that although the short-term outlook is bleak, the long-term outlook is broadly positive.
Participants were polled between November 22 and December 5 2007, so the survey provides a snapshot of the financial services industry at its lowest point before the three-month Libor levels rebounded and the Bank of England cut interest rates.
For the first time in a while, financial services firms are less worried about regulation and are more occupied with raising funds. That said, insurers are beginning to consider and budget for the advent of Solvency II, which has led to an increase in expenditure despite falling profits in the insurance sector. “2008 is the first year that insurers are starting to spend for regulation,” said Clare Thompson, head of PwC’s risk advisory services group.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
How geopolitical risk turned into a systemic stress test
Conflict over resources is reshaping markets in a way that goes beyond occasional risk premia
Many banks see obstacles to options-based IRRBB hedging
Liquidity, accounting treatment and culture seen as impediments to wider use of swaptions, caps and floors
ALM has no formal role in capital planning at a third of banks
Risk Benchmarking study finds banks split three ways on policy mandates, with G-Sibs as likely as small regionals to assign ALM formal responsibility
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
SGX fortifies its defences to ward off tomorrow’s outages
Exchange operator fosters “breach mentality” to help prepare for business disruption, explains risk chief
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities