PwC accounting firm grounded in Tokyo
TOKYO – PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) suffered embarrassment in Japan this month when the Tokyo office of the accounting firm – Chuo Aoyama PricewaterhouseCoopers – was suspended from doing business for two months by the nation's Financial Services Agency.
The suspension was a result of the firm's work for a client, cosmetics and textiles manufacturer Kanebo, where a significant fraud has been uncovered. PwC's Japan office has been barred from auditing corporate accounts under Japan's securities and commercial laws for two months, beginning July 1.
Three of PwC's accountants have been charged in connection with the Kanebo fraud, after they admitted helping the company hide losses as part of a nine-year effort to disguise the true state of its finances. The company has been broken up and parts of the business have been sold to competitor firms.
While the ban on PwC won't impede the work the firm is currently doing on clients' March 31 year-end results, it is a huge blow to the accounting firm. The FSA said the accounting firm's failure to detect and prevent the fraud was a result of "serious deficiencies" in internal controls. Many Japanese clients are expected to abandon the firm in the coming months once this year's results are done and dusted.
PwC, meanwhile, has swung into full fighback action. According to press reports, it sent Andrew Popham, a senior partner, out to Tokyo to handle the aftermath of the temporary ban. Also, the firm announced that it is setting up a new affiliated firm that will be adopting "international best practices in accounting and auditing".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation