A little respect
First, a bit of gloating. The April edition noted that there was a serious risk of Basel II deadlines being pushed back in the US and Europe, and now that looks as it has come to pass, at least in the US ( see related article, in this issue )
I have also had several rather kind notes about last month’s editorial, on the relationship between Rousseau and Basel II. I must confess that it was the product of a debate I had with a colleague after drinking far too much red wine while at a conference in Madrid, so am glad that my ramblings made some sense.
This month’s thought? At the risk of sounding like I am shamelessly pandering to Operational Risk’s readership, I’d like to say I am surprised at just how under-appreciated op risk managers seem to be. Our third annual op risk survey, sponsored by consulting firm Protiviti, shows that although more and more responsibility is being placed on the shoulders of op risk managers, the funding that should be coming through to help them meet this increased burden doesn’t seem to be in place.
And in our monthly survey, we asked if operational risk managers’ "board of directors understand operational risk to the level of sophistication you consider appropriate?" The answer was a resounding ‘no’ – 78.6% answered that way.
Should we initiate an annual ‘Operational Risk Respect Day’? Thoughts welcome, as always…
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
CGB repo clearing is coming to Hong Kong … but not yet
Market wants at least five years to build infrastructure before regulators consider mandate
Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance
A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives
Repo clearing: expanding access, boosting resilience
Michel Semaan, head of RepoClear at LSEG, discusses evolving requirements in repo clearing
The state of IMA: great expectations meet reality
Latest trading book rules overhaul internal models approach, but most banks are opting out. Two risk experts explore why