UAE enforces tighter capital adequacy rules
Tighter Basel capital adequacy rules will be brought in for banks operating in the UAE
DUBAI - The United Arab Emirates (UAE) will introduce stricter rules for banks' capital adequacy, despite its existing system having higher adequacy ratios than recommended under Basel II, according to one Saudi Arabian bank.
Saudi American Bank (Samba) said the UAE's 24 domestic banks and 24 foreign units would need to increase capital adequacy ratios to 11% by July 2009 and to 12% by July 2010, citing a recent decision by the UAE central bank.
"Efforts are being made to shore up UAE banks' capital to enable them to withstand financial pressures as non-performing loans increase and asset prices fall, especially real estate," said Samba in a statement.
UAE bank capital ratios have traditionally been high, but had been falling over the past few years - reaching 13.4% on aggregate at the end of 2008. Central bank governor Sultan bin Nassir Al Suwaidi has said that while he is satisfied with the performance of UAE banks, they must consolidate their capital basis because of the global crisis.
Under current Basel II regulations, the capital adequacy ratio requirement is 8% - although the UAE already operates a 10% ratio. Basel II says Tier 1 capital must be at least 4% of total risk-weighted assets, whereas the UAE maintains a tighter 6% minimum ratio, while ruling that Tier 2 capital cannot exceed 67% of Tier 1.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts