Illiquidity Risk: The Foundations of Modelling

Robert Fiedler

After fixing some technical notation we shall describe the bank’s vulnerability to illiquidity in a cashflow model: the forward liquidity exposure (FLE). The bank’s ability to counterbalance a detrimental FLE is then modelled as the counterbalancing capacity (the substitute for capital if compared to value risks). We initially reduce the complexity of the problem by simply ignoring all uncertainties. To account for the ambiguity of the reality we will in Chapter 5 describe step by step the modelling of more complex uncertainties and categorise them according to their different sources. The uncertainties materialise in cashflows that either change according to changing generation rules or stem from changing or new transactions.

Describing the bank’s balance sheet

Before we model uncertainty we need be able to describe the mechanics of a bank’s balance sheet and therefore introduce the necessary technical concepts as briefly as possible. We further fix some notation around uncertainty, risk and scenarios in order to have them at hand when we come to develop our approach to illiquidity risk.

Financial transactions, payments and nostro accounts

The bank interacts with the

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here