Journal of Risk

This issue of The Journal of Risk contains papers that offer practical approaches for two common estimation techniques for value-at-risk (VaR), namely, historical simulation and extreme value theory. The other two topics considered in the issue are the assessment of bond portfolios with missing credit ratings and a behavioral perspective on option risk management.

Though historical simulation, through various improvements, has become a favored approach to estimating VaR, it has also been subject to pitfalls. Among them are its focus on a single tail of the loss distribution, which incorrectly assesses short positions, and its lack of robustness, which results from insufficient data. These shortcomings are addressed in the first paper of the present issue, "Historical simulation with component weight and ghosted scenarios", in which Xinyi Liu develops an efficient method that combines data augmentation (which is common in empirical likelihood inference)with exponential weighting of observations.

Another technique that is particularly prized for VaR is the peak-over-threshold method, though the main challenge has been to correctly determine its critical threshold. The latter problem has led to the development of a variety of procedures, with uneven degrees of success. In the issue's second paper, "Extreme value theory, asset ranking and threshold choice: a practical note on VaR estimation", Benjamin R. Auer shows that, for the purpose of assessing asset riskiness for portfolio inclusion, there are no substantial differences between standard historical simulation and the peak-over-threshold method.

In our third paper, "Bayesian synthesis of portfolio credit risk with missing ratings", Dror Parnes considers bond portfolios that contain assets for which credit ratings are missing (there are a variety of plausible reasons for ratings being missing). He proposes a Bayesian alternative to the traditional weighted average ratings approach that can both predict the average default rates of homogeneous portfolios and provide a better basis for supporting credit gains through diversification.

In the fourth and final paper of the issue, "Managing option-trading risk when mental accounting influences prices", Hammad Siddiqi evaluates the impact on Black-Scholes based risk parameters of the subjective assessment of a call option relative to its underlying. He shows that a mental accounting perspective is better suited than the Black-Scholes model to justifying the popularity of covered call writing; the paper also includes a discussion of alternative risk measures.

Farid AitSahlia
University of Florida

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: