Journal of Operational Risk

Risk.net

Should risk managers rely on the maximum likelihood estimation method while quantifying operational risk?

Bakhodir Ergashev

ABSTRACT

This paper compares the performance of four estimation methods, including the maximum likelihood estimation method, which can be used in fitting operational risk models to historically available loss data. The other competing methods are based on minimizing different types of measure for the distance between empirical and fitting loss distributions. These measures are the Cramer–von Mises statistic, the Anderson–Darling statistic and a measure of the distance between the quantiles of empirical and fitting distributions. We call the last method the quantile distance estimation method. Our simulation exercise shows that the quantile distance estimation method is superior to the other three methods, especially when loss data sets are relatively small and/or the fitting model is misspecified.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: