Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures

A bill of goods: central counterparties and systemic risk

Craig Pirrong


A truly systemic analysis of the impact of clearing demonstrates that the effects of mandated clearing on systemic risk are ambiguous at best. Some aspects of clearing, such as netting and collateralization, redistribute risk rather than reduce it. Expanding clearing makes the financial system more tightly coupled and transforms credit risk into liquidity risk. Moreover, clearing creates wrong-way risks. When all of the effects of clearing are considered holistically, it is evident that mandated clearing was oversold as a means of improving the stability of financial markets.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here