Journal of Credit Risk

Practical and theoretical challenges in validating Basel parameters: key learnings from the experience of a Canadian bank

Peter Miu and Bogie Ozdemir


This paper, inspired by the efforts of a Canadian bank, discusses Basel preparation and validation issues. A comprehensive outcomes analysis (eg, back-testing) framework is presented, including a simulation-based calibration test. A consistent risk rating philosophy – point-in-time (PIT) or through-the-cycle (TTC) – encompasses both the probability of default (PD) and the default correlations, and the validation needs to be consistent with both. Related arguments are made that not only PD itself, but the correlation of PD used in economic capital models should be ratingsystem specific. We need to use a larger PD correlation under a TTC rating system than under a PIT rating system. Furthermore, Basel loss given default may not be appropriate for commonly used internal models, and accordingly adjustments are proposed.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here