メインコンテンツに移動

One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs

Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks

SVB and Credit Suisse
Credit: Risk.net montage/PIXDUCE/Alamy/Getty

When large banks fail and markets tremble, it’s natural for regulators to want to know how to prevent another crisis in the future. So it is with the crisis of 2023, which took down Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and First Republic in the US, and Credit Suisse in Europe. But to know if regulations need changing, you first have to agree on what exactly went wrong.

The US’s acting comptroller of the

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here