LCH shakes up compression vendor fee structure
Proposals follow criticism that current regime favours top provider TriOptima
LCH is set to offer refunds to smaller compression providers if they tear up 1 million trades in a given year, amid accusations from members that its current fee structure cossets TriOptima, the reigning provider.
Under the central counterparty’s previous fee regime, firms could become top-tier platinum providers – which could schedule unlimited runs, for free – if they generated £5 million ($6.3 million) a year in fee revenue for LCH. Now, firms will simply have to tear up 1 million trades in a year. Silver- and gold-tier firms will be refunded their vendor fee for the previous year if they hit this threshold. Otherwise, the current annual fees are £200,000 a year for silver and £480,000 for gold.
LCH’s two other approved compression service providers (ACSPs) – Quantile and Capitalab – do not hold platinum status.
The proposals – effective from January 1, 2019, and filed with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission on December 11, 2018 – follow criticisms from the CCP’s members, reported by Risk.net, that LCH’s fee structure for compression providers is overly complex, and does little to encourage competition among providers. In particular, several market participants complained the current setup encouraged TriOptima to schedule an excessive number of runs on favourable days, shutting out rivals and loading more work onto banks’ back offices.
Besides the rebates, LCH is also proposing that platinum-tier vendors – TriOptima is currently the only one – pay a top-up fee if a compression run does not meet a minimum efficiency standard: 15,000 tear-ups in one cycle. Not everyone is convinced the January 1 changes will remedy the situation, however.
“It’s good to see the rebate – that should help the smaller players,” says an XVA trader at one large bank. “But the bigger problem is there’s no disincentive for the bigger player to pile in and do more runs. They could have simply charged all providers equally, or just capped the overall number of runs. That would maximise the benefits of each.
“I would like to see them scrap all of these thresholds, and just have a target number of trades. It’s too complicated.”
LCH, TriOptima and Capitalab declined to comment. Quantile was not available for comment.
Under the new regime, gold- and silver-tier ACSPs will no longer have to pay a fee for performing additional runs outside their yearly allocations, provided those exceed a certain level. Euro and dollar cycles will be free of charge if the provider is able to compress 15,000 trades; runs in sterling must reach 8,000 to qualify.
Should additional runs fall short of those targets, the fees would remain at £22,500 a cycle for the silver tier and £18,000 for gold.
Conversely, platinum vendors will be charged an £18,000 penalty if one of their compression runs slips below 15,000 trades crushed in euro and dollar runs, or 8,000 in sterling.
This measure could mitigate complaints on the efficiency of compression cycles – the theory is if ACSPs risk a penalty for sparsely populated runs, they may elect to compress less frequently to ensure higher levels of participation.
Asked whether the moves are enough to encourage greater competition, the XVA trader says it is a start.
“I do find it slightly strange,” he says of the pricing structure. “It would have been nice if they’d gone a bit further, but it’s a step in the right direction.
“The platinum providers should be charged if they want to run as frequently as they do. At the moment, they don’t have to pay LCH for additional runs. That makes the number of cycles too many, and too frequent, which has led to a reduction in the effectiveness of compression, as dealers have to choose how many we can participate in. We have to limit the number of runs we do at the moment. We think there are too many. It would be better if everybody was in for big ones.”
Editing by Joan O’Neill
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら リスク管理
CROは気候リスクの負担を担っていますが、より大きな組織全体の状況は不透明である
専任チームの規模は大きく異なりますが、その責任はリスク管理部門、サステナビリティ部門、および事業部門の間で共有されています。
ISITCのポール・フラム氏が欧州におけるT+1への懸念について語る
決済業務の移管に先立ち、取引処理部門の責任者は予算制約、テスト、および業務上のリスクに対する懸念を理由として挙げています。
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation
「モデルは全く間違っていない」:気候リスクをめぐる論争
Risk.netの最新ベンチマーク調査によりますと、銀行は数十年にわたるエクスポージャーに直面している一方で、政治的な逆風、限られたリソース、データ不足といった課題にも取り組まざるを得ない状況にあります。
意外なことに、サイバー保険の保険料が2025年に低下した
攻撃の頻度と深刻さが増しているにもかかわらず、保険会社間の競争により保険料は低下しています。
オペリスクデータ:カイザー社、病気の偽装により5億ドルの支払いを主導
また:融資不正取引が韓国系銀行を直撃;サクソバンクとサンタンデール銀行でAMLが機能せず。ORXニュースのデータより
市場がベーシス取引に関するFSBの懸念を共有せず
業界は、債務発行が増加する中、より厳しいヘアカット規制が市場の容量を制限する可能性があると警告しています。
CGBレポ清算が香港に導入される予定…が、まだその時ではない
市場は、規制当局が義務化を検討する前に、インフラ整備に少なくとも5年を要すると見込んでおります。