メインコンテンツに移動

Replacing VAR: smaller banks fear expected shortfall workload

Regulators sparked a lively theoretical debate at the biggest banks by proposing the use of expected shortfall as the trading book capital metric in place of the simpler incumbent measure, value-at-risk. But for small to medium-sized banks, the issue is a practical one – do they have the resources to implement it? By Laurie Carver

shortfall-web-app
Do banks have enough data to implement expected shortfall safely?

Outside a pub in London's swanky Mayfair district, the top quantitative analyst at one of the UK's biggest banks takes a gulp of his expensive lager, then shrugs in a not-my-problem kind of way. "Expected shortfall? It's not really an issue," he says. "Not for us, anyway."

Maybe so, but on the other side of the tracks, those banks with more modest resources offer a very different answer. For them

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here