メインコンテンツに移動

Study casts doubt on mandatory futures insurance

Mandatory insurance for assets held by futures brokers would be extremely costly, concludes industry-backed report

Security padlock image
FCM implosions have sparked calls for better protection

A mandatory insurance fund designed to protect customers from a futures commission merchant (FCM) bankruptcy would be very costly to implement, but a voluntary solution in which FCMs banded together to form a captive insurer might be feasible, according to a recent industry-sponsored study.

The study was commissioned after two high-profile FCM failures, the 2011 collapse of New York-based MF

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here