メインコンテンツに移動

SEC under fire over no-fault settlement agreements

The SEC’s practice of fining financial institutions for wrongdoing while not seeking an admission or denial of guilt is regularly criticised as not being a strong enough deterrent for rogue behaviour. At first glance it seems ethically wrong, but practically, does it make sense?

courtroom

Ten years ago, the pushback began against the practice of arranging cash settlements – often with no admission of guilt – between regulators and companies that had broken the rules.

In 2003 Federal judge Jed Rakoff of the US District Court in Manhattan refused to approve a $500 million settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and collapsed telecoms company WorldCom. The

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here