メインコンテンツに移動

Killing two birds with one stone

Buyers of credit derivative protection are acutely aware of the two-name issue – the risk that your provider of credit default swap protection goes bust at the same time as the name it is protecting. Ian Clague investigates how market participants are responding to the problem

cprisk-woodhams-gif

Users of credit derivatives contracts have always been aware that credit default swaps (CDSs) expose users not only to the name the protection is written on but also to the firm that writes the protection. And it didn’t take long after the advent of the CDS market to see just how closely correlated these two risks can be.

The 1997 Asian financial crisis rammed home the issue of two-name exposure –

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here