メインコンテンツに移動

Incremental concerns

The Basel Committee released revised proposals on charging capital for incremental risk in the trading book in July. The new rules cover a broader range of risks beyond default, but some fear they may close off vast swathes of business. By John Ferry

asiarisk-oct08-44-gif

The Basel II framework has some gaping holes, and the credit crisis has drummed that fact home. Risk managers drastically underestimated default, correlation and liquidity risks, while it became apparent that the current value-at-risk-based measure for assessing capital for the trading book did not capture all risks associated with complex securitised products.

The political pressure for regulatory

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here