メインコンテンツに移動

Default dilemmas

The US formula for determining downturn loss given default under Basel II has been criticised by banks as too conservative. Some risk managers claim it could derail the objective of creating a level playing field across jurisdictions. Ashish Dev and Zailong Wan look at the evidence

The implementation of Basel II in the US stands apart from the approaches taken by regulators in other parts of the world. While the differences are numerous and have emerged from many directions, two issues have predominated among large, internationally active US banks. First, risk managers claim the US proposals are overly conservative and put domestic banks at a competitive disadvantage

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here