CCP recovery and resolution: New tools, but no rules

Some clearing houses are adopting loss allocation mechanisms as a last line of defence if one or more clearing members default. That might help a central counterparty get back on an even keel, but what happens afterwards is unknown. Matt Cameron reports

Mariam Rafi

When the Titanic hit an iceberg in the north Atlantic in 1912, it had 20 lifeboats on board, capable of carrying only half of its 2,200 passengers and crew – there had been little attempt to prepare for the worst. Financial regulators want to avoid that mistake as over-the-counter derivatives clearing houses set out on their own maiden voyage, carrying trades that will mushroom into hundreds of trillions of dollars.

As a result, clearing houses and their member firms are trying to add extra

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Switching CCP – How and why?

As uncertainty surrounding Brexit continues and the impacts of Covid-19-driven market volatility are analysed, it is essential for banks and their end-users to understand their clearing options, and how they can achieve greater capital and cross…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here