Risk waterfall at CME, Ice makes porting harder, dealers say

porter with heavy load

The need to port client positions within central counterparties (CCPs) could force clearing houses to rethink how they structure the ‘risk waterfall’ used to absorb losses, dealers say. Clearing houses such as LCH.Clearnet’s SwapClear already lean more heavily towards initial margin – which individual members and their clients post to cover their own losses – while others, such as Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), are said to have a higher reliance on default funds, which are pooled contributio

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: