Reviving securitisation: regulators send mixed messages

Reviving securitisation

kevin-ingram

Since mid-2007, when waves of structured finance downgrades marked the start of the crisis, securitised products have been battling stiff headwinds – many of them regulatory. So-called ‘skin in the game’ rules now force issuers to retain risk in new deals, capital requirements for banks and insurers are being cranked up, and regulators are closely scrutinising new transactions for signs of capital arbitrage.

Recently though, some supervisors have been singing from a different hymn sheet. Most

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: