VAR versus expected shortfall: why Priips has got it wrong

Hardwiring of older risk measure into Priips means risk ratings could mislead investors

Missing the point: the Priips 2.5% VAR methodology effectively disregards any differences in the products' KIP barrier levels

David Stuff is co-founder and chief executive of Cube Investing, a distributor focused on structured investments; Arthur Noble is director of research at Cube Investing

Despite its troubled birth, there is much to admire about the aims of Europe's forthcoming regulatory overhaul of the retail structured products market. First and foremost, the Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (Priips) regulation will, for the first time, put structured products on a level footing with

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: