Reverse convertibles: the disclosure debate

Reverse convertible securities in the US have been the subject of both harsh criticism and subsequently intense regulatory scrutiny. The stock market gyrations of late 2008 into 2009 caused the majority of reverse convertible securities to knock out, setting off a firestorm that singed retail investors’ portfolios and set off regulators’ smoke alarms. Could enhanced reverse convertible disclosure reverse the damage? Lori Pizzani reports

regulations-prove-a-delicate-balancing-act
How to get the right balance of quantity and quality of disclosure?

Reverse convertible securities have been the most prolifically issued structured note in the US in the past few years. High-net-worth investors with a bullish viewpoint on a stock can reach out to potential issuers through the reverse inquiry process and choose the structured note linked to an underlying of choice. Moreover, mainstream retail investors have been flocking to reverse convertibles, drawn in by the high coupons being offered on well-known names.

But cases have come to light of mis

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here