Skip to main content

Naming the counterparty: how far would you go?

The debate in the UK over counterparty naming and inclusion of the issuer prospectus in marketing material for structured products continues. Richard Jory asks industry professionals what should be revealed and what is the minimum credit rating retail investors are willing to accept for the issuer of a structured product?

emma-davidson
Emma Davidson, Citi

Emma Davidson, head of UK and Ireland retail structured product sales at Citi

Last year highlighted the importance of transparency. Information should be readily available for investors, and providers of structured products (from manufacturers to independent financial advisers) need to be equipped to answer any questions completely, honestly, and in a way that is comprehensible to investors. When

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here