FDIC chairman Bair’s warning on Basel II models

Daily news headlines

NEW YORK – Revolutions in financial fortunes over the past year provide as many lessons for the implementation of Basel II models as they do for transparency, according to Sheila Bair, chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in a speech to the Global Association of Risk Professionals.

Bair spoke about the modelling consequences of shifting ratings for products such as structured investment vehicles, monoline insurers, municipal bond auctions and mortgage-backed securities.

Bair said: “Reflecting this belief in models and ratings, many were impatient with a go-slow approach to Basel II. They did not want capital safeguards, and they did not want the US leverage ratio. Today the financial world looks and feels vastly different.”

Bair said that regulators have increased risk exposure through Basel II’s advanced measurement approach, by lowering the risk weight on many of these collateralised debt obligation securities by 7% or less.

“The advanced approaches in general represent a heavy bet on the accuracy of models and quantitative risk metrics. Based on specific assumptions about loss correlations, the framework promises heavy reductions in capital requirements for virtually any credit class with a favourable loss history. And this can encourage banks to lever up far more than they already have in a competitive dynamic to boost their return on equity.

“So, here’s the bottom line: we have a major lack of transparency in structured finance. And we have regulatory policies, including Basel II, that may have the unintended consequence of encouraging some banks to bet heavily on non-transparent ratings and models,” said Bair.

She highlighted the importance of addressing these issues as part of a careful evaluation of the Basel II securitisation framework, emphasising that banks will need incentives to use the information rather than just making it more readily available through transparency.

“Regulatory policies should not encourage banks to ignore traditional credit analysis in favour of placing financial bets whose success depends on the accuracy of any particular rating, or particular model,” she said.

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: