Talking point: Is there ratings disparity in structured credit?

pg16-james-kauffmann-jpg

Increasing complexity in structured credit and different rating methodologies are eroding consensus as to what constitutes a triple-A deal. What problems might any ratings disparity be causing investors?

JAMES KAUFFMANN - Head of fixed income, ING, Atlanta

Consensus across agencies is important, but so is the consistency of the methodology and consistency of how and when it is applied. Regarding synthetic corporate CDOs, I believe that investors do realise that a dual-rated tranche is higher

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here