Podcast: George Hong on quanto derivatives and Asia’s quant drought

Credit Suisse quant talks about new paper on valuing quanto options

Podcast Mauro and Naz 300118
Nazneen Sherif and Mauro Cesa

Credit Suisse quant talks about new paper on valuing quanto options

George Hong, head of the Asia-Pacific quantitative and risk strategies team at Credit Suisse, dialled in from his Hong Kong office to talk about his new paper on the valuation of quanto derivatives.

Quanto options gained popularity in the 90s as a way of taking a position on an asset without taking on its currency risk. The derivatives essentially allow an investor to take a position on a particular asset denominated in one currency, whereas the instrument itself is settled in another currency at a certain foreign exchange rate.

Despite financial institutions’ widening global footprint, and a corresponding increase in their forex risk management capabilities, quantos still remain a popular product in Asian markets. This is mainly because of the higher yields they can offer in a yield-starved environment, argues Hong.

“For example if the investor is bullish on Nikkei, but if the interest rate is too low on the Japanese yen, then by choosing a quanto derivative which has the payoff currency in, say, Australian dollars – which obviously has a much higher interest rate – one can get the best of both worlds compared to a non-quanto vanilla note which is yen-denominated,” said Hong.

However, the products aren’t easy to value. Back in the 1990s, in a constant volatility environment, a simple tweak to the drift term of the Black-Scholes model would have allowed one to value quanto options very easily. But today, with volatility skew, most valuation techniques can be quite cumbersome to compute and implement. Simple shortcuts might exist that can value the products quicker, but they lack accuracy.

Hong has developed a model that uses the so-called stochastic collocation method – a tool for quantifying uncertainty – to value quanto options.  According to Hong, it is fast, more accurate and simpler to implement than existing techniques.

“The old ad hoc approach or implied approach, they were very successful because of a few things. They were very simple to understand; it was universal, it was very easy to implement and it was also very fast. What I am hoping to achieve is that this new method can retain all these advantages, but at the same time be much more accurate in capturing the volatility of skew,” said Hong.

The quant also said he will be doing more exploration into the use of stochastic collocation in his future research, and highlighted that more quant talent is needed in Asian markets because of the “quant drought” in Asia.

“There is a high demand and low supply of quants in the Asian markets. With a lot of exciting trends, say, for example, incorporating data science into quantitative finance, there is actually a lot of quant problems to solve here in Asia. It will be great if we can see more quants move to Asia,” said Hong.

Index:

0:00 Introduction

1:03 Quanto options

1:30 Why are quanto options popular?

4:34 Difficulty in valuing quanto derivatives

7:28 Industry practices for valuing quantos

9:20 Simplified approaches

11:05 Introduction of the paper

13:14 Advantages of the new model

14:48 Challenges to implementation of new model

16:12 Future research

17:30 Problems to solve in Asian markets

To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here