Ashurst non-netting opinion on China splits lawyers

EU banks using opinion for margin exemption, at possible cost of capital savings

Just how enforceable are netting arrangements with Chinese counterparties?

An exemption in Europe’s derivatives margining rules has given law firms the power to deliver margin savings for their bank clients, but only at the risk of torpedoing hopes for future capital relief.

The debate centres on China, where Ashurst is thought to be the only big, international firm currently issuing legal opinions that netting is unsafe – the basis for the European margin exemption. So far, its peers have not followed suit, with some lawyers claiming this is because a so-called non

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here