Small banks underpricing FVA, dealers claim

Dealers claim to be losing trades because smaller rivals are mispricing

low-price-sign
FVA: dealers accuse some banks of undercharging

Dealers say they are losing derivatives business to competitors that are not charging enough for funding valuation adjustment (FVA) – the costs and benefits associated with uncollateralised or partly collateralised trades. Smaller banks are said to be the primary offenders.

FVA arises when a dealer has executed an uncollateralised trade with a client and hedged it under the terms of a two-way credit support annex (CSA), which requires both sides to post collateral. When the dealer is in-the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: